West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals

Miscellaneous Motions Conference

Thursday, April 28,  2005

1.

Elliott G. Hicks
Robert L. McKinney, II
(Counsel for Defendants)

Frank M. Armada
(Counsel for Plaintiffs 

Kanawha - King 

Refuse 3-2
[ Maynard, J., Benjamin, J. ]

Petitioner in Christina D. Craddock v. Terminix International Company, Limited Partnership, No. 050432, seeks a writ of prohibition to prohibit the enforcement of an order denying petitioners’ motion to dismiss or stay a case in the lower court pending arbitration.

2.

Carter Zerbe
(Counsel for Petitioner) 

Janet James
(Asst. Atty. Gen.)

 Kanawha - Kaufman

Refuse 4-1
[ Albright, C, J. ]

 

Petitioner in Harold Petry, II v. F. Douglas Stump, Commissioner, West Virginia Division of Motor Vehicles, No. 050523, seeks a writ of prohibition to prevent the DMV Commissioner from holding further hearings on the revocation of his driver’s license.

3.

Matthew Victor
(Counsel for Petitioner) 

Wayne - Pratt

Refuse as Moot

 

Petitioner in The State of West Virginia ex rel. Crit Muncy v. The Honorable Darrell Pratt, No. 042268, seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the lower court to rule on his pending petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

 

4.

Matthew A. Victor
(Counsel for Petitioner) 

John Boothroyd
(Counsel for Respondent) 

Braxton - Facemire

Refuse 5-0

 

Petitioner in The State of West Virginia ex rel. Thomas E. Rush v. The West Virginia Parole Board, No. 050547, files a petition of a writ of habeas corpus to review the denial of parole by the Parole Board.

5.

James W. Withrow
(Counsel for Appellee) 

Jason Poling
(Counsel for Appellant) 

Kanawha - Bloom 

Grant 5-0

The Board of Education in Suzanne Carte v. Board of Education of the County of Kanawha, No. 32045, moves to dismiss this appeal as moot.

6.

Douglas H. Arbuckle
(Counsel for Petitioner) 

Mark G. Sergent
(Roane Pros. Atty.)

Jackson - McCarty

Refuse 5-0

Petitioner in State ex rel. Jerry V. Bolin v. James Rubinstin, Commissioner, No. 050406, seeks a writ of habeas corpus contending ineffective assistance of counsel.

 

  Home | Opinions | Site Map | Law Library | Rules Staff   | Search  | Terms of Use